StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Step Right Up!  Get Your Snake Oil Here!

3/25/2022

1 Comment

 
Picture
Agri-Pulse Communications, who aspires to be "the most trusted farm and rural policy source in Washington, D.C., providing a balanced perspective on a wide variety of issues including the farm bill, nutrition, trade, food safety, environment, biotechnology, organic, conservation and crop insurance" has some snake oil to sell you.
Agri-Pulse Communications, Inc. is pleased to lead a webinar to discuss how expanding, integrating, and modernizing the North American high-voltage grid can drive rural economic development. Speakers will highlight the good-paying jobs that expanding high-voltage transmission will create, in addition to improved electricity affordability, reliability and sustainability.
What good paying jobs?  Building high voltage electric transmission is a specialized skill that is contracted through a handful of national companies.  There are no local jobs for unskilled labor building new transmission.  It's not going to make your electricity any more affordable either.  Those lines don't get built for free.  Electric consumers pay for them in their electric bills.  If they build billions worth of new transmission, you're going to pay for it.  Reliability and sustainability don't belong in the same sentence.  Wind and solar is not reliable.  And, besides, isn't your power already reliable?  Why would you want to pay for increased "reliability" you don't need?

But the biggest lie:  economic development.  The new transmission will cut through prime farmland, placing an impediment in the production line.  In exchange, farmers will get "fair market value" for a tiny strip of land whose use as a transmission right of way ruins the entire field.  And just in case you're thinking, "Oh, heck no!", you won't have a choice.  The transmission (or pipeline) company will apply for eminent domain authority and your state utility commission may hand this out like a party favor.  How does any of this "help" a farmer?  It doesn't.  Not.At.All.

Even more insulting, these folks think you're a bunch of ignorant rubes who can be easily fooled.  Do they believe if they just tell you it's beneficial, that you will fall all over yourselves to get some?

Got an hour to kill next week?  Sign up for this "webinar."
It probably won't be interactive so that you can tell these snake oil salesmen what snakes really want, but at least you'll be prepared for the sales pitch when they show up in your town like a traveling circus.

And if you don't like what you hear during the webinar, be sure to tell Agri-Pulse exactly what you think about their participation in this shameful scheme to take advantage of rural folks, and if they keep hanging out with these snake oil salesmen and helping to peddle the snake oil that they may no longer be trusted by the rural communities that financially support their company.
1 Comment

Who Is At Fault For Rising Transmission Rates?

3/23/2022

0 Comments

 
Retail electric rates are rising in Kansas.  In this story, the Kansas Corporation Commission tries to shift blame to the legislature, but that's not the whole story.  Transmission rates are rising because more transmission is being proposed and built.  More transmission is being proposed and built to support renewable energy facilities and the export of Kansas wind to other states.  The KCC is the one who approves the building of these new transmission facilities.  If the KCC stopped acting like a rubber stamp approving every new transmission facility proposed in Kansas, whether it benefits Kansans or not, then the rates would not increase.  End of story.  It's the KCC's fault and only the KCC can control rising transmission rates.

We're constantly being told that renewables will lower our electricity rates because they have no fuel costs.  But that's not exactly accurate, as the rising transmission fees in Kansas demonstrate.  Connecting new renewable generators requires new and updated transmission, and much of the new transmission is being built to export renewable power to other states.  Why should Kansans pay to export power that others will use?  The Kansas state government loves new wind installations because they supposedly provide new "economic development" and jobs.  But they don't really.  Once built, there are few jobs.  Even construction jobs aren't given to Kansans, but to a handful of national specialty companies that build high voltage electric transmission.  Do renewable generators pay more taxes to localities?  This is an open-ended question as generators are always looking to abate their tax liability or secure payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) deals.  So, what exactly is Kansas getting from all this?  Well, I suppose elected officials get generous campaign contributions from renewable energy companies, but the average Kansan is getting zip.

In the news article, the KCC blames statute KSA 66-1237.  The statute says
Any electric utility subject to the regulation of the state corporation commission pursuant to K.S.A. 66-101, and amendments thereto, may seek to recover costs associated with transmission of electric power, in a manner consistent with the determination of transmission-related costs from an order of a regulatory authority having legal jurisdiction, through a separate transmission delivery charge included in customers' bills.
Who is the regulatory authority with legal jurisdiction to set interstate transmission rates?  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.  States have no jurisdiction over interstate transmission rates but must pass the rate set by FERC through to customers.  The state is not permitted to "trap" costs that FERC says the transmission owners may recover by denying them.  This is clear in Evergy's filing at the KCC:
Company shall collect from applicable customers a Transmission Delivery Charge (TDC) based on its annual transmission revenue requirement (ATRR) for costs to be recovered under the following schedules of the Open Access Transmission Tariff for Service Offered by the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) for service to Company’s retail KCC-Jurisdictional customers.

The TDC Unit Charges included on the following sheets are designed to recover the retail
transmission revenue requirement. The Company shall file to adjust TDC Unit Charges to reflect and track changes in FERC-approved rates for charges included in the ATRR according to the terms of this rate schedule.
The transmission rates in the TDC are set by FERC and collected pursuant to Southwest Power Pool tariffs. 

Put the blame where it belongs... the overbuilding of interstate transmission projects ordered by SPP for benefit of the region as a whole, not just Kansans.

So, the next time you hear that your electric bill is going to go down if you use more renewable energy, remember this!  The cost of building new generators and transmission to connect them will make your bill increase.  Will your bill increase more than the lowered fuel costs you may receive from using more renewable energy?  Of course.  This story is undeniable proof.

Renewable energy profiteers, environmental groups and the federal government have a problem.  When regular folks realize that renewables are actually increasing their electric bills, then renewables won't be so popular any longer.  They really were hoping to keep the lid on the problem until they got all this stuff built and it was too late to change course.  But with transmission rates being what they are, the cost increases happen in real time.  The best they can do now is try to shift blame everywhere except where it really belongs. 

It belongs to those who approve the building of new transmission for the purpose of exporting renewable electricity hundreds or thousands of miles from remote locations.
0 Comments

News Flash:  Skelly Admits He Is Full Of Crap

1/12/2022

1 Comment

 
Finally, an admission!
Skelly said markets and mechanisms are critical, “so that private actors can come in and compete and beat the crap out of each other and bring costs down.”
Well, you can't beat the crap out of someone who isn't composed of crap in the first place. 

Touche'.

We also get one of those almost analogies that Skelly spews.  The ones where he tries to make an analogy, but in the same breath ends up tripping over it.
“It’s not a gale-force wind, but it’s a little bit of momentum out there in the world for us to tap into,” said Michael Skelly, the CEO of Grid United, a Houston-based transmission developer.
Compare to the famous Ironman/triathlon/decathlon/marathon that wasn't.
You would think in eight years, you would have sort of a lull, but it’s a sort of a mad dash every day to move these projects forward,” Skelly said. “It’s more like an Ironman [Triathlon], not a marathon. It’s more like a decathlon, but it goes on for eight years.”
Blah, blah, blah.  Why does anyone think this guy is relevant anymore?  He's admittedly full of crap.  He has no relevance to the story here, but that never stops him from making failed analogies to the media.

What this story is about is the eagerness of energy companies to help themselves to the taxpayer buffet of free cheese legislated into existence by a biased and uninformed Congress.  Case in point:
That “could accelerate everything we’re doing in our clean energy transition and probably provide some pretty nice [cash flow] features to fund additional capital investment,” said James Chapman, the chief financial officer at Virginia-based Dominion Energy Inc. “So it all seems pretty good.”
Right.  Pretty nice cash flow.  The utilities are raking it in... and it all comes from our pockets.  They wouldn't be interested in "clean energy" at all if they weren't making money hand-over-fist building it.  It's not about climate change, equity, or the future of our planet.  It's about
Picture
It's about
Picture
Gale Klappa, executive chairman of Milwaukee-based WEC Energy Group, said he expected that extensions of renewable tax credits would happen. “It’s such a sausage-making machine in Washington as you know, but if I were a betting man, I think something will pass,” Klappa said, referring to the “Build Back Better” plan under consideration through the budget reconciliation process.
I'll take that bet and raise you $20, Gale.

When you put out the cheese, the rats will show up.

So much crap, it smells like an overflowing manure pit on an August afternoon.  Also an analogy... correctly presented.
1 Comment

ACEG Finds Something Nasty in its Punch Bowl... again!

12/13/2021

0 Comments

 
Hats off to you, Ellen Barfield... whoever you are!  Ellen had the nerve to ask a relevant question during one of "Americans for a Clean Energy Grid's" recent proganda-inars.  I haven't been to one of their ridiculous "events" in years, ever since I had the nerve to ask a relevant question myself, which got me deleted from their mailing list and dis-invited to future "events."  I'm sure Ellen will find herself similarly blacklisted soon, but I have a feeling she, like me, absolutely doesn't care.  I mean, it's not like average Americans actually tune into these events to be educated... it's usually just to have some fun with the schmucks and ask questions they would rather not address.

ACEG might need to tighten up its list though... because random Americans keep getting in.  One such American tuned into the recent propaganda-inar for giggles and then sent me a report and screen shot.  It seemed like when Ellen asked her rather pertinent question, the chat was subsequently shut down.  I guess they were afraid they might get even more questions they didn't want to answer from, you know, Americans?

Ellen asked this:
Picture
And when the idiots got to the Q&A part of their propaganda-inar they said something ridiculous and inapt like transmission is necessary to provide renewables from afar when local ones aren't working.  So, when offshore wind isn't producing (which is like, never) then solar from California could save the day for east coast states.  Idiots, indeed.  The narrative goes something like this... when the sun is up in California, it produces more than they need so they could share.  But, as soon as it sets, California finds itself in need of imports from elsewhere, like east coast offshore wind.  The idiots assure that renewables are producing more than needed somewhere at any time of day.  Except when it's night, and California needs a replacement for its solar.  The sun has set to the east hours ago, and night is long and dark.  It's not like wind generators elsewhere can pick up all this load, plus their own solar-dependent load after sunset.  I guess there just won't be any electricity after dark anymore.  Adjust, it's the new normal.

Who is even fooled by this silly, swiss cheese narrative?  The idiots talk a lot about "resilience," which is a new concept that began happening right about the time fossil fuel baseload power began shutting down.  How come "resilience" is a new concept?  Why hasn't it become an issue during the past 100 years?  The problem is that as we become more renewable dependent, variable renewables simply can't keep up with maximum generation events.  When we had plenty of baseload power that could run when called, those generators were there to pick up the slack during weather events.  Now we don't have that luxury.  It's not like weather has changed much, it's that the new normal generators simply can't keep up when anything out of the ordinary happens.  And then they need to "borrow" generation from other regions shipped on new transmission "for resilience."  But as more and more baseload generators get priced out of market and shut down, the pool of "resilient" generators gets smaller and smaller.  Soon, it could cease to exist at all.  What good are "resilient" transmission lines that are  not connected to any producing generator?    Building new transmission for "resilience" is idiotic.

I was also humored by ACEG's last minute addition of some guy from Google supposedly representing "consumers."  Google is about the biggest consumer there is, but it doesn't represent the average American consumer.  If I was allowed in the room I might have asked him why he thinks Americans should pay more in their electric bills to build more transmission and renewables so that his company can meet the corporate goals it sets for itself?  It's not like the average American consumer had any say in Google's corporate goal setting, therefore they should not pay for it.  I might also ask him why Google doesn't site its energy gulping data centers in the Midwest, close to all these renewables it is demanding, and save the rest of us the cost of new transmission?  Why junk up the Washington, DC suburbs with a bunch of new data centers and then demand everyone else pay to supply them with renewable energy?  I mean, what Google employees would want to live THERE when they could live in Kansas, or Oklahoma, and have wind turbines and solar panels in their own backyards?

The arrogance is simply stunning.

And the idiocy.

How about Americans for Reliable and Affordable Generation of Electricity?  Think about it.

Ta-ta until the next propaganda-inar, when Americans will infiltrate and ask pertinent questions.
0 Comments

The Future of Big Wind

6/21/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
This wind turbine was built in 2012.  This is a picture of it taken recently by the Public Utility Division of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.

This isn't the only droopy, burned, or broken turbine at this abandoned wind farm located in the Oklahoma panhandle near Hitchland, Texas.  There are lots more... see the pictures here.

The OCC has found the disrepair at this 9-year old wind farm to be a danger to the public and ordered the owner of the wind farm to submit a plan to secure its decrepit industrial energy generator.

Here's the plan.

Perhaps a little duct tape?

How much of our landscape is going to be littered with hazards like this on our journey to "net zero?"


0 Comments

Shocker:  Unreliable Renewables Cause Power Shortages

6/15/2021

1 Comment

 
It wasn't even a month ago that I wrote about NERC's recent predictions that increased reliance on renewables, such as solar and wind, in both California and Texas would cause shortages this summer that could require calls for consumer conservation, and eventually rolling blackouts if it gets bad enough.

Well, guess what?  It's happening, just as predicted.

California tells public to prepare for heatwave; power prices soar.

The California power grid operator told the public to prepare to conserve energy next week if needed as homes and businesses crank up their air conditioners to escape what is forecast to be a brutal heatwave.

But the ISO said it will notify the public if it needs to take steps to reduce electricity use, including a call for public conservation and if the grid becomes seriously stressed, rotating outages.

The group responsible for North American electric reliability has already warned that California is the U.S. region most at risk of power shortages this summer because the state increasingly relies on intermittent energy sources like wind and solar...

And what did California do?  It added more solar.  Yay.  Seems like it's not helping.

And then there's Texas...  Texas grid asks residents to conserve power as heatwave hits.
Texas's embattled electrical grid operator warned residents to cut electricity use "as much as possible" for the rest of this week, as several days of heat over 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32°C), combined with generation outages, could strain the grid even before summer officially starts.

ERCOT was "supposed to have enough reserves to meet peak demand this summer, yet here we are in mid June with the first bout of high temperatures and they are already seeking conservation," said Matt Smith, director of commodity research at ClipperData, a provider of commodities data and analytics.
"It does not bode well for the months ahead," Smith said.
Adding more wind, or more power lines to move unreliable wind around the state, isn't a long-term solution to this problem.  This is what happens when states rely on unreliable renewables. 

Thanks to federal subsidies for renewables that artificially make renewables the cheapest power out there, unsubsidized baseload fossil fuel power that can run when called is priced out of market and closed.  It's no secret that our federal government wants to force all fossil fuel electricity generators to close.  When they do, the entire country is going to be in the same boat as California and Texas.

It is suggested that spending trillions on new transmission for these unreliable renewables will be able to fill in the gaps by importing/exporting enormous amounts of electricity around the country.  It relies on the presumption that wind or solar will be producing in excess somewhere.  This only works on paper, or in some wacky computer simulation where renewable production is averaged out to a set percentage of full capacity.  Except it doesn't actually work that way.  When renewables are not producing, there is no power.  Presuming that your neighbors have enough excess to power your entire state is a fool's paradise during widespread weather events... or the roughly 12 hours per day when the sun isn't shining.  We simply don't have the technology to build enough batteries that can carry urban loads for any sustained period.

If we build some supergrid that sucks power from other regions to feed places like California, what are the other regions going to use to power their own towns?  Who makes the determination of power priority?  Will it be the federal government, making political decisions for the party that's in power?  Will rural America turn into a power-producing serfdom for the big cities that is blacked out first?  We're heading for disaster.  Why won't politicians listen to reliability experts like NERC?  Whatever happened to "science?"
1 Comment

Becoming Transmission Woke

6/1/2021

0 Comments

 
In a recent article in NPR, a spokeswoman for Cardinal Hickory Creek transmission line accuses the Environmental Law and Policy Center of being "contradictory."  Strip away all the weasel words and she says that they're hypocrites.  If the ELPC supports "clean energy" it must also support Big Transmission.

After years of supporting Big Transmission like Clean Line Energy Partners, ELPC got transmission woke when a Big Transmission project "for renewables" got sited in its own backyard.  This is undeniable reality:  People don't like renewables when infrastructure to support it gets sited in their own backyard.

ELPC's wokeism spurred an organizational change to supporting "no wires alternatives", such as advanced transmission technology that makes better use of existing transmission.  ELPC still supports "clean energy", but it does so while recognizing the environmental damage caused by Big Transmission.  Is this hypocrisy?  Or the beginning of a sensible new trend where big green becomes transmission woke?

Big Transmission as the solution to "climate change" is headed towards oblivion.  The more gigantic projects they dream up, the better the odds that one of them will get dangerously close to the places environmental groups hold dear.  Already, having an environmental hypocrite like ELPC in their nest is causing great concern.  The wokeism is only going to spread, because once you get transmission woke, there's simply no going back.  Landowners will NEVER change their minds and welcome new overhead transmission for renewables.  No matter what the transmission profiteers propose, and no matter how much OPM* (Other People's Money) they spend "incentivizing"** transmission, they are simply spinning their wheels.  Opposition will continue, and increase, including opposition from environmental groups.

NPR says that Cardinal Hickory Creek is in trouble, and the trouble is coming from ELPC, the only party with the resources to drag it through the courts.  Bravo!  However, it also demonstrates one of the foundational tenets of transmission opposition, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."  For years, big green fought against transmission when they thought it was "for coal."  Now that it's supposed to be "for renewables", big green loves transmission.  Is this hypocritical?  You bet'cha!  ELPC demonstrates that it isn't about transmission at all, but about environmentalism.  Isn't it time that big green goes back to its roots and stops being a well-funded patsy for an increasingly greedy energy industry?  See tenet above.  A landowner is likely to get whiplash from the changing transmission policies of big green.

Environmental groups in New England are at war against each other over the Big Transmission project New England Clean Energy Connect.   ELPC is not alone, the wokeism is blossoming, along with the finger pointing and claims of hypocrisy.

Why does this swirling sea of transmission frenemies matter?  Because it further degrades the pedestal of moral superiority to which Big Transmission has ascended by making it murkier and less trusted.  Landowners have long been suspicious of the regulatory process that approves or denies Big Transmission.  Is it really about transmission being needed, or is it simply about buying influence and political support?

A Wisconsin judge summed it up recently when ruling on a claim of bias by the state PSC in the Cardinal Hickory Creek approval:
“(I)t is essential to our democratic system, to our design of government, that we maintain the process as fair in appearance and in practice,” Frost wrote. “At least then the disappointment of the losing party is in having lost, not in being cheated by an unfair process or decision maker. Disappointment is acceptable. Distrust is dangerous.”
Wise words that should be applied universally these days.  We all know what you're doing behind closed doors and we simply don't trust you.
*Financial incentives, loan guarantees, and tax credits paid for by taxpayers.
**This is not a word.  Incentive is a noun, not a verb. 

0 Comments

Welcome To The Brave New World of Unreliable Renewables

5/28/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation recently released its 2021 Summer Reliability Assessment.

Two words:  Buy candles.

NERC sees possible problems ahead in California and Texas.  Coincidentally, these regions have built a lot of renewables, which causes "more expensive" fossil fuel generators to close.

About California:
WECC-California is at risk of energy emergencies during periods of normal peak summer demand and high risk when above-normal demand is widespread in the west. Prior to summer, the planning reserve margin (which is based on existing and firm capacity) for the California-Mexico assessment area was below the 18.4% Reference Margin Level that WECC calculates is needed for maintaining loss-of-load risk below a 1-day-in-10-year benchmark (a 400 MW shortfall at peak demand). Probabilistic studies indicate 10,185 MWh of energy in the area is expected to go unserved this summer. Over 3 GW of additional resources are expected for this summer with most coming in the form of new solar photovoltaic (PV) generation. These generation plants can provide energy to support peak demand; however, solar PV output falls off rapidly in late afternoon while high demand often remains.
More electric use (homes, cars) combined with unreliable, variable renewables equals disaster.  How might California avoid it?
Imports to the area are needed to maintain reliability when demand peaks in the afternoon and to ramp up even further for several hours as internal resources draw down. California will have 675 MW of new battery energy storage systems on-line at the start of the summer that can continue to supply stored energy for periods when needed. Reliance on non-firm imports to cover high demand or low resource output conditions heightens the risk that operators will need to use energy emergency alerts (EEA)—and trigger the shedding of firm load in above-normal heat conditions—to maintain a stable BPS at times. Planned resource additions of 1,300 MW over the summer, including 825 MW of new battery storage, are expected to help mitigate late-summer risks.
California plans to suck energy out of neighboring regions.  California depends on other states to supply its energy.  Why?  It's not that California cannot build baseload generation that runs when called, like natural gas, it simply chooses not to.  Gotta meet those renewable energy goals, ya know.... at least on paper.  But are they really effective when the "dirty" energy is produced in other regions?  This is not realistic, and Californians may pay the price this summer with increased blackouts.

In addition, there's the risk that a weather event, such as a wide area heat wave for instance, can make less energy from other regions available as they deal with their own needs.  Imports are unreliable.

There's also:
Additionally, transmission networks can become stressed when events such as wildfires or wide-area heatwaves cause network congestion. The growing reliance on transfers within the Western Interconnection and falling resource capacity in many adjacent areas increases the risk that extreme events will lead to load interruption.

Operation of the BPS can be impacted in areas where wildfires are active as well as areas where there is heightened risk of wildfire ignition due to weather and ground conditions. Wildfire prevention planning in California and other areas include power shut-off programs in high fire-risk areas. When conditions warrant implementing these plans, power lines (including transmission-level lines) may be preemptively de-energized in high fire-risk areas to prevent wildfire ignitions.
So, even if other regions can supply the power California needs to meet its own need, it often can't happen during wildfire season because transmission is shut off so it doesn't start a fire.  Hey... don't you think BURYING transmission might allow it to continue to operate during wildfire season?  Overhead transmission and investor owned utility neglect caused by greed creates disaster.  Again, California's energy policies are insufficient to meet demand.  This isn't an aberration.  This is the new normal of a "clean" energy future.

About Texas:
Variable energy resources from wind and solar are critical to meeting peak electricity demand in ERCOT. Periods of low wind generation or higher-than expected thermal outages create a reliability risk during peak load hours. ERCOT appears to be in a weather cycle that may increase the risk of intensifying drought conditions and higher than normal summer temperatures. These weather factors could result in actual summer peak demand exceeding the forecast, which already anticipates record peak demand levels. Thermal outages may increase during severe and prolonged drought conditions due to cooling water supply and temperature issues.

Highest risk for unserved energy at peak demand hour, late afternoon (Risk can
extend for 1–2 hours after peak as solar PV output diminishes. Periods of low-wind, which usually occur 1–2 hours before peak demand, can also result in extended shortfall risk
.)
Again, reliance on variable, undependable renewables causes shortages.  Texas has a lot of wind and solar.  Blackouts are the result.

This is scary news.  However, the mainstream media chooses not to report reality (surprise!  surprise!).  Instead, the media chooses to focus on climate change being responsible for the shortages.  They also like to talk about other things that don't really matter, like the Colonial Pipeline hack.  Anything but the fact that electric systems dependent upon renewables are not dependable. 

Just look at the capacity factors for wind and solar in the table at the end of the NERC report. The lowest wind capacity factor is listed as 7%, with the majority of them hovering somewhere between 10 and 20%.  This means that those generators can only be expected to reliability produce 7% of their potential.  Do you know how much overbuilding these poor capacity figures require?  Does this even make sense?  We'd have to build way too many to get any kind of "reliability," and even then the "reliability" is only a percentage on paper... reality may differ. 

"But this turbine produces energy reliably 7% of the time!"  However, today is a 0% day." Off go the lights.

Speaking of plans that only work on paper... building enormous amounts of new overhead transmission in order to hook all these poorly performing renewables together to produce a 7% chance of getting energy is so much fantasy.  If increased reliance on renewables requires imports from other regions, what happens when all regions have increased reliance on renewables?  Where does the energy come from then?

The warning is stark.  Nobody is paying attention because it's not what they want to hear.

NERC officials warned:
The full report identifies the extent of the possible deficiencies, and Robb told reporters of his own concerns about how the energy transition might be impacting reliability.

"In our hurry to develop a cleaner resource base, reliability and energy adequacy have to be taken into consideration," he said.

The latest reliability assessment is "quite concerning," John Moura, NERC's director of reliability assessment and performance analysis, told reporters.

Summer 2020 and winter 2021 were "difficult to say the least," Moura said, and the latest assessment signals "similar risks" lie ahead.

In the long-term, system operators must do extensive analysis to ensure the addition of variable resources will not negatively impact reliability, he added. "As we look forward, it really just looks more stressful," Moura said, "because of the different resources coming onto the system."

Get used to it... electricity is going to become a "sometimes" commodity if we continue to spiral faster and faster towards the "zero carbon" fantasy.  Reliability will be sacrificed in the name of "climate change."  Didn't the "clean energy" folks tell us we'd have to make some hard choices?
1 Comment

What Will You Give?

5/5/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Joe Kalin in News-Press Now
Will you remember him when you turn on the "clean" electricity the media tells me you're "demanding?"

Read Joe Kalin's story in the St. Joseph, Missouri, News Press.
Joe Kalin has fond memories of growing up in the Buchanan County countryside.
His father came from Switzerland and turned 87 acres near Faucett, Missouri, into a successful dairy farm, where Kalin lived and worked with four brothers and a sister. Before passing it to the next generation, Kalin’s father instilled a deep appreciation for the land and its productive capacity.
“My parents both come from the old country,” said Kalin, now 84. “My father, he loved to farm. It was given to us boys as an inheritance. We were always told to take care of it, that it would care of us.”

Mr. Kalin is being threatened with eminent domain so that a merchant transmission company can build an overhead electric transmission line across his family farm. 
It’s a 780-mile, high-voltage transmission line that threatens to cut through the land that brought John Kalin to America in the 1920s. The project, known as the Grain Belt Express, seeks to transfer wind power from western Kansas to population centers east of the Mississippi River.
Perhaps for you, dear reader.  Are you a person east of the Mississippi who has been demanding "clean energy?"  Do you know and appreciate what it's going to take to fulfill your "demands?"  There are millions of Joe Kalins between your house and that fictional "Saudi Arabia of Wind" located vaguely somewhere in the Midwest.  It's time to get acquainted.  Remember his face!  And think about what he's being asked to sacrifice so that you can assuage your climate guilt by pretending the electricity you freely use is "clean." 
For his part, Kalin said he isn’t against green energy but opposes being forced to pay the price while others reap the benefits. He doesn’t want to look out the window and see 150-foot power poles where his father once saw a landscape reminiscent of an alpine meadow.
“I don’t like the government telling people what they can do and can’t do with their land,” he said.

Mr. Kalin isn't going to use any of the electricity that's proposed to cross his farm.  He gets no benefit.  Just sacrifice.  If he has to sacrifice in the name of "clean energy," what sacrifice are you making?

No, I'm serious.  I want to know what you're sacrificing for the sake of the climate.  I mean personally, not some generalized feel good buzzwords.  Go ahead, post a comment.  I want to hear from you.

Are you donating a portion of your private property for the use of a profit-generating corporation?  Mr. Kalin is being told he must allow an easement across his own property so a corporation can make money.

Are  you donating a portion of your 401(K) to some climate change reversing business?  How much?  A farmer's retirement is his land.  When his land is appropriated for someone else's use, it reduces the productivity and future uses for his farmland.  It reduces the value of his retirement nest egg.

I have yet to hear from one person demanding clean energy, just one for goodness sake, who can say their sacrifice in the name of "climate change" is as significant as Joe Kalin's.

Don't turn a blind eye to the reality of "clean energy."  And don't give me a list of "whataboutisms".  They don't impress me.  Everything you do affects someone else.  When are you going to be responsible for your own needs?  Or are you just that type of person who gladly walks over others to benefit yourself?
0 Comments

The Assault on Rural America Has Begun

4/14/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
Have you ever really contemplated the crackpot conspiracy theory fleshed out on various TV shows that there is some secret entity actually running our country?  That elected officials are mere puppets of some secret global cabal?  Why is it that most of the wealth is concentrated within a very small group of people?  Does money buy power?  If you've ever wondered about these things, pull up a chair, this blog is for you...

Last week I told you about Biden's plan for investment tax credits for electric transmission lines, though there was actually little information to be had.  My Alexa must have been on the job reading my mind, because the very next day the text of new legislation introduced in Congress to make the transmission investment tax credit a reality was revealed.  Thanks, Jeff Bezos, what would I do without you and your AI spy?  If I can think it, you can deliver it!

Here's a link to the bill.  Go ahead, click through.  It's amazingly brief and facile.  Not what you'd be expecting for a complicated giving away of hundreds of millions of dollars of your money.  The real "guts" are contained in the IRS code -- this just establishes a transmission investment tax credit at 30%.  The IRS has to figure out how to run the program.  The legislation just sets the parameters for it, such as what kind of electric transmission qualifies for the tax credit?

Are you ready?
‘‘(c) QUALIFYING ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION LINE PROPERTY.—The term ‘qualifying electric power transmission line property’ means— ‘‘(1) any overhead, submarine, or underground transmission facility which—
‘‘(A) is capable of transmitting electricity at a voltage of not less than 275 kilovolts,
‘‘(B) has a transmission capacity of not less than 500 megawatts,
‘‘(C) is an alternating current or direct current transmission line, and
‘‘(D) delivers power produced in either a rural area or offshore, and

‘‘(2) any conductors or cables, towers, insulators, reactors, capacitors, circuit breakers, static VAR compensators, static synchronous compensators, power converters, transformers, synchronous condensers, braking resistors, and any ancillary facilities and equipment necessary for the proper operation of the facility described in paragraph (1).


Power produced in a rural area?  So transmission for power produced in an urban area  cannot qualify for this tax credit?  You may be thinking that they don't need transmission for power produced in an urban area because it can be used where it's produced.  But think a little harder... this discourages any future power production in urban areas and encourages lots of future power production in rural areas.  It provides the carrot on a stick to a future where rural areas operate as the power production serfs that serve their powerful masters in the cities.  Power production in rural areas is encouraged through a giveaway of your tax dollars. 

But what if they used that money instead to develop power production in the cities and suburbs that use so much of it?  That would probably be a cheaper scenario, by far.  But our government is pushing for a different reality where the cities are mere power parasites feeding off the sacrifice of rural areas.

Let's peel this onion to see just how many layers there are to this bold plan to enslave rural areas...  and discover that they're not even trying to hide it anymore.  When the elites control every aspect of the narrative, plus the puppets who will carry it out, there is nothing to fear from plebeians.

This article in Renewable Energy Magazine ties this legislation to ACORE, the American Council on Renewable Energy.  Of course the legislators who are sponsoring this legislation are nothing but lobbyist puppets, doing what they're told.  If they don't buck the system, they are rewarded with campaign contributions that keep them in office.  If legislators don't do any real work writing or reading legislation, what do they DO all day?  Run around like remote-control robots making sure things happen like they are ordered to happen, preening for the cameras, feeding their egos.

ACORE put out a brief press release.  Very proud of themselves and their legislative puppets.  ACORE says this tax credit will serve their Macro Grid initiative.
“Sen. Martin Heinrich, Rep. Steven Horsford and Rep. Susie Lee’s introduction today of the Electric Power Infrastructure Improvement Act adds to the growing momentum for a federal transmission investment tax credit (ITC). As we saw this winter, America’s outdated grid infrastructure is hurting consumers and our economy. With a transmission ITC, we can enhance grid reliability, create jobs, save consumers money, and provide developers with the long-term certainty they need to invest in a 21st century Macro Grid that’s capable of delivering the clean energy future Americans want and deserve. We look forward to working with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to pass this critically important legislation this year.”
So what, or who, is ACORE?  Here's a lovely photo collage of their rather extensive Board of Directors (for even more fun, there's also a doubly large Board of Directors Emeritus).  24 people on the BOD.  24!  How do they ever manage to get things done?  But, all that aside, look at who these 24 people are, and what "member companies" they represent.  NextEra, Pattern, Avangrid, Invenergy, Berkshire Hathaway -- all companies who stand to profit significantly by building new renewable generation and transmission to serve it.  The list also includes equipment suppliers of renewable energy technology and equipment.  But perhaps most disturbing of all is that it also includes lots of big investors such as BlackRock, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs.  And then there are some really odd, but powerful, additions, such as Facebook and Amazon.  Hang on... my Alexa is going crazy trying to take my order for renewables right now...

ACORE's mission pretends it's just an educational, tax exempt organization that doesn't lobby.
The American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) is a 501(c)(3) national nonprofit organization that unites finance, policy and technology to accelerate the transition to a renewable energy economy.
I guess they don't have to actually lobby... just place an Alexa in every legislator's home, office and car.

But isn't it funny that all these companies stand to make a bundle of money from new legislation that enables their business and profits?  And legislators get so "educated" about it that they write bills about things they know nothing about?  Wow!  Serendipity!

But wait... let's see what's in the next layer of this onion.  ACORE's Macro Grid initiative.  Who came up with that?  ACORE's 2020 Annual Report reveals:
Thanks to generous support from Breakthrough Energy, ACORE and Americans for a Clean Energy Grid (ACEG) launched the Macro Grid Initiative to promote investment in a 21st century transmission infrastructure that enhances reliability, improves efficiency and delivers more low-cost clean energy.
And is extremely profitable for ACORE's Board of Directors, don't forget that part.  Your beneficent pose isn't working for me.

Who is "Breakthrough Energy?"  Here's the layer where you really start to smell the rot that pervades this entire charade...
Breakthrough Energy Ventures is an investor-led fund that aims to build the new, cutting-edge companies that will lead the world to net-zero emissions.
Our strategy links government-funded research and patient, risk-tolerant capital to bring transformative clean energy innovations to market as quickly as possible.
Again, it's not about beneficence, it's about making money, lots of it.  And in order to do that, they have to influence government policies and programs at the highest level.

Even more revealing, take a good, close look at Breakthrough Energy's Board & Investors.

There you'll find some very familiar names... multi-billionaires you've heard of, along with a host of other filthy rich people from around the globe that you've never heard of.

The cast of characters includes:  Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, Jeff Bezos (Alexa, shut up, I'm trying to work here), and some Walton family members. 

And it also includes a huge list of other multi-billionaires from around the globe and includes members from Saudi Arabia, India, England, China, Canada, Germany, South Africa, France and Japan.  And China.  Did I mention China?

These folks who funded ACORE's Macro Grid initiative are intending to invest in renewable energy projects in order to get even richer.  But it's not just that... let's dial back out.

Where did the transmission investment tax credit first get mentioned?  In President Biden's "Infrastructure" thing.  Do you suppose he independently came up with that idea and it was just happy coincidence that it lined up with what the global elite wanted?

Or do these global elites, who control a substantial portion of the world's wealth, also control our elected officials?

Who really wants to make sure all energy of the future is produced in rural areas, and not in the cities?  Is it really about climate change, or is it simply a rent seeking operation?  And how would the .00001% distract the hoi polloi from their bold scheme?  Maybe they buy up the media, control the narrative, and create a crisis that pits the average American against his neighbor and uses up all their energy and attention fighting each other while the robber barons help themselves to what little wealth we have left.

So... transmission investment tax credits.... yes or no?
1 Comment
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.